|
Summary Strategic
public relations does not begin with a press release, a social media post, or
a media briefing. It begins with research — and it ends with evaluation.
Between these two poles lies a structured four-step discipline that separates
reactive, instinct-driven publicity from evidence-based communication
management. This article presents a rigorous examination of the RACE
framework — Research, Action Planning, Communication, Evaluation — as the
definitive architecture for constructing effective PR campaigns. Drawing on
foundational scholarship from Marston, Cutlip, Lindenmann, Anderson and
Hadley, and Paine, and enriched with modern examples from LEGO, Dove,
Transport for London, Google, Netflix, and the World Health Organization,
this article argues that the quality of every PR campaign is determined
before a single message is written. Strategy precedes communication; research
precedes strategy; and evaluation closes the loop that makes each subsequent
campaign more effective than the last. |
Keywords: RACE Framework | Strategic PR
Planning | SWOT Analysis | PR Objectives | Formative Research | Campaign
Evaluation | Communication Strategy
|
SECTION 01 Introduction Why Strategy Must Come Before Communication |
In public relations, as in warfare,
medicine, and architecture, the quality of the output is determined by the
quality of the planning that precedes it. Yet public relations has historically
struggled with a tactical bias — a professional culture that prizes the
creative press release, the clever media hook, and the well-staged event over
the rigorous situational analysis and measurable objective-setting that should
precede all of these.
The result, in organisations where this
bias goes unchecked, is a PR function that is perpetually busy but rarely
strategic — producing communications that cannot be tied to organisational
goals, campaigns that cannot be evaluated because no baselines were
established, and messaging that misses its intended publics because no research
was done to identify them.
|
|
Far too many resources
are wasted on creative tactics that fall short of addressing the real needs
of the issue. If a strategy cannot be tied to an essential outcome, it should
not be executed. — Strategic PR Planning Principles |
The antidote to tactical PR is the
strategic planning framework — a structured, research-anchored process that
ensures every communication effort is connected to a clearly defined goal,
targeted at a specific public, measurable against a pre-established benchmark,
and evaluated rigorously at completion. The most widely used expression of this
framework is the RACE acronym, developed by John Marston in 1979: Research,
Action Planning, Communication, Evaluation.¹
¹ Marston, J.
E. (1979). Modern public relations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
This article traces the full RACE cycle —
examining each of its four steps in depth, identifying the common failure
points that organisations encounter in each, and illustrating the framework
with contemporary examples from global organisations that have deployed it with
measurable success.
|
R RESEARCH Analyse the situation |
A ACTION PLANNING Goals, objectives, strategy |
C COMMUNICATION Execute with tactics |
E EVALUATION Measure and refine |
The RACE model is not merely a mnemonic. It
represents an epistemological commitment: to the idea that public relations
decisions should be grounded in evidence, structured around measurable
outcomes, implemented through carefully designed tactics, and evaluated with
the same rigour as any other management function. Each stage of the model is
examined in turn.
|
SECTION 02 Step 1 — Research Formative Intelligence and Situational Analysis |
The first step in the RACE framework is
research — and it is the step most commonly shortchanged, most frequently
skipped under time or budget pressure, and most consequentially neglected when
it is. Research is not preparatory to strategy; it is the foundation on which
strategy is built. Without it, the PR professional is navigating without a map.
As Cutlip, Center, and Broom define it,
research in this context is "the systematic gathering of information to
describe and understand situations and check out assumptions about publics and
public relations consequences."² Its purpose at this stage is formative:
to understand the situation facing the organisation with sufficient depth and
precision that the PR response addresses root causes rather than surface
symptoms.
² Cutlip, S.,
Center, A., & Broom, G. (2006). Effective Public Relations (9th ed.). Upper
Saddle, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Primary and
Secondary Research in Situational Analysis
Effective situational research draws on
both primary and secondary sources. Secondary research — existing studies,
industry reports, academic literature, government data, and social media
analysis — provides the contextual scaffolding and is typically the least
expensive starting point. Primary research — original data collected
specifically for the organisation's research question, through surveys,
interviews, focus groups, and observational methods — provides the proprietary
intelligence that secondary research cannot.
In practice, secondary research identifies
what is already known; primary research fills the gaps and provides the
organisation-specific intelligence needed to design a targeted response. The
balance between the two depends on the complexity of the situation, the
resources available, and the degree to which existing research accurately maps
the organisation's specific stakeholder environment.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | LEGO — Adult Fan Research Programme (2019–present) Secondary Research Revealing a Missed Opportunity LEGO's strategic pivot toward the adult consumer
market — one of the most commercially successful brand strategy shifts of the
2020s — was grounded in formative research that identified and quantified a
latent public the company had systematically overlooked. Secondary research —
analysis of social media communities (AFOL: Adult Fans of LEGO groups),
existing customer data, and third-party consumer trend reports — revealed
that a significant and growing proportion of LEGO's most passionate and
highest-spending customers were adults. This was not a new phenomenon, but it
had not been integrated into LEGO's communications or product strategy.
Supplemented by primary research in the form of ethnographic studies and
focus groups with adult LEGO communities in multiple countries, LEGO
developed a detailed situational understanding that allowed the company to
articulate a clear problem/opportunity statement: the company was
systematically under-communicating with its most valuable consumer segment.
The resulting "Adults Welcome" strategic campaign — launched in
2021 — generated worldwide media coverage, significant sales growth in
adult-targeted product lines, and measurable improvement in brand sentiment
among the 18+ demographic. Reference: LEGO Group. (2021). Adults Welcome Campaign —
Strategic Brief. LEGO Communications Division. |
The SWOT
Analysis
The most widely used analytical tool for
synthesising situational research is the SWOT analysis — a structured
examination of internal Strengths and Weaknesses, and external Opportunities
and Threats. The SWOT framework is valuable precisely because it forces the
organisation to look in two directions simultaneously: inward at its own
capabilities and limitations, and outward at the environment in which it is
operating.
|
STRENGTHS (Internal) • Established brand reputation • Strong media relationships • Financial stability • Innovation-driven culture |
|
OPPORTUNITIES (External) • Emerging market demand • Regulatory support for project • Growing stakeholder advocacy • Positive policy environment |
|
|
|
|
|
WEAKNESSES (Internal) • Weak community relations • Limited CSR history • Over-confidence in decisions • Insufficient PR resources |
|
THREATS (External) • Organised opposition groups • Potential legal injunctions • Negative media framing • Activist social media campaigns |
The power of the SWOT framework lies not in
the four quadrants individually but in their interaction. Once internal and
external factors have been mapped, four categories of strategic response become
visible:
|
SO
Strategies Use organisational Strengths to capitalise on
external Opportunities. The most optimistic strategic posture — building on
what the organisation does well in a favourable environment. ST
Strategies Use organisational Strengths to counter external
Threats. A defensive but proactive strategy — deploying existing capabilities
to neutralise or reduce the impact of an adverse environment. |
|
WO
Strategies Address and improve organisational Weaknesses to
better exploit external Opportunities. A developmental strategy — investing
in capability-building to position for a favourable environment. WT
Strategies Correct organisational Weaknesses to defend against
external Threats. The most defensive posture — simultaneously addressing
internal vulnerabilities and an adverse external environment. |
The output of the SWOT analysis and broader
situational research is a two-paragraph situation statement — the first
paragraph redefining the situation using the data collected, the second
identifying the barriers to resolution — from which a single, succinct
problem/opportunity statement is distilled. This statement becomes the
foundation of the strategic plan.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Shell — Energy Transition Communication Strategy (2020–2023) SWOT-Driven PR Repositioning in a Contested Environment Shell's strategic communication challenge over this
period was among the most complex in the energy sector. Its SWOT analysis
revealed significant internal strengths — substantial investment in renewable
energy infrastructure, strong relationships with institutional investors, and
a well-resourced global PR function. But it also revealed critical internal
weaknesses: a brand still heavily associated with fossil fuels in the public
mind, a track record of commitments on emissions reduction that had drawn scrutiny
from activist groups, and internal cultural tensions around the pace of the
energy transition. Externally, the analysis identified genuine opportunities
— growing investor interest in ESG-aligned assets, favourable policy
environments in key European markets, and increasing public openness to
"transition" energy narratives. Threats included sustained
campaigning by environmental NGOs (Friends of the Earth successfully sued
Shell in the Netherlands in 2021, securing a court order requiring
accelerated emissions reductions), intensifying media scrutiny of
"greenwashing," and regulatory developments across multiple
jurisdictions. The SWOT-derived problem statement — that Shell's
communications were seen as lagging behind its commitments, undermining
stakeholder trust — directly shaped its subsequent stakeholder engagement and
media strategy. Reference: Friends of the Earth Netherlands v. Royal Dutch
Shell plc, District Court of The Hague, 26 May 2021. |
|
SECTION 03 Step 2 — Strategic Action
Planning Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Tactics |
The second step of the RACE framework —
Strategic Action Planning — is where the intelligence gathered in Step 1 is
translated into a structured, measurable plan of action. This step is the
architectural core of the PR campaign: without it, even excellent research
produces no strategic output; and without strong objectives, even creative
execution cannot demonstrate value.
The strategic plan proceeds through four
nested levels: Goal → Objectives → Strategies → Tactics. Each level provides
the direction for the next; each must be tied to the research that preceded it.
The Goal
The strategic plan begins by converting the
problem/opportunity statement into a goal. The goal provides the overall
direction of the campaign — the destination that all subsequent objectives,
strategies, and tactics are designed to reach. A critical distinction must be
observed in goal-setting: the goal must describe what the organisation will do,
not what it wants the public to do.
Because publics cannot be controlled — only
influenced — a goal that frames success in terms of public behaviour ("the
public will support our pipeline project") sets the organisation up for
failure. Instead, the goal should focus on what is within the organisation's
control: to communicate and act in ways that earn the consent, understanding,
or endorsement of key publics.
|
|
"To use
communication and actions that improve relationships with key members of the
community in order to successfully complete a pipeline that delivers newly
found methane gas to customers." This goal is focused on what the
organisation can control — its own actions — not on controlling the public. — Strategic PR Planning Principles |
Objectives: The
Four Criteria
Objectives provide the direction for
specific, measurable outcomes within the goal framework. They are the
milestones against which the success of the PR campaign will be evaluated.
Anderson and Hadley's four criteria for an effective PR objective provide the
definitive standard:³
³ Anderson, F.,
& Hadley, L. (1999). Guidelines for setting measurable public relations
objectives. Institute for Public Relations.
1.
An objective must be an end, not a means to an end — it
must describe an outcome (a change in awareness, attitude, or behaviour), not a
communication activity (placing 30 articles in newspapers).
2.
An objective must be measurable — it must specify a
quantifiable change that can be assessed against a baseline established through
formative research.
3.
An objective must have a time frame — without a
specified deadline, accountability is impossible.
4.
An objective must identify the public — different
publics will be at different levels of awareness, attitude, and behaviour, and
the objective must specify which group is being addressed.
|
✕
WEAK OBJECTIVE |
|
✓
STRONG OBJECTIVE |
|
"Increase sales of Product X by 20% over the
next 6 months among younger consumers (ages 18–24)." Problem: Too many uncontrollable variables (price, product
quality, availability, distribution) affect sales. PR cannot claim sole
credit. This objective sets the function up for failure. |
|
"Increase awareness of Product X among young
consumers (18–24) by 20% within the next 6 months." Strength: Measurable, time-bound, public-specific, and within
PR's control. Directly tied to a cognitive outcome that PR activity can
genuinely influence and demonstrate. |
The Three
Levels of Objectives
Lindenmann's taxonomy of PR objectives
distinguishes three levels, each measuring a different dimension of campaign
impact:⁴
⁴ Lindenmann,
W. K. (2003). Guidelines for measuring the effectiveness of PR programs and
activities. Institute for Public Relations.
|
Level 1 OUTPUTS Measures of production and distribution — how many press
releases issued, audience size reached, percentage of positive coverage,
share of voice. Useful but only the means, not the end. |
Level 2 OUTTAKES Measures of reception and comprehension — whether the audience
actually received, understood, and retained the key message points. More
meaningful than raw outputs. |
Level 3 OUTCOMES Measures of actual change — shifts in awareness, attitudes, and
behaviour attributable to the PR effort. The most important level; the
hardest to measure; the most strategically valuable. |
|
|
|
The Output Trap One
of the most persistent errors in PR planning is treating output objectives —
placing messages in media, reaching a defined audience size — as genuine
campaign objectives. These are not objectives; they are strategies. The
number of press releases issued, articles placed, or social media impressions
generated tells an organisation how effectively it distributed its message.
It says nothing about whether that message changed anything in the minds,
attitudes, or behaviours of the intended public. Output measurement without
outtake and outcome measurement is sophisticated counting — not strategic
evaluation. |
Strategies and
Audience Segmentation
Once goals and objectives are set,
strategies define how objectives will be reached for each identified public.
Effective strategy development requires three things: identifying what needs to
be accomplished with each public (tied to the objective), segmenting audiences
by common characteristics, and creating communication approaches that connect
to the self-interests of each segment.
Audience segmentation in PR strategy
operates across three primary dimensions:
|
Demographic
Segmentation Gender, age, education level, income, ethnicity,
political affiliation, household size. Demographics determine baseline
differences in how publics relate to an issue and which channels and messages
are most likely to resonate. Geographic
Segmentation Location determines proximity to an issue and shapes
the intensity of stakeholder concern. Residents within a thousand feet of a
proposed development have fundamentally different interests from those living
a mile away. |
|
Psychographic
Segmentation Values, lifestyles, attitudes, and identity.
Psychographic segmentation reveals the deeper motivational drivers that
demographic data alone cannot capture — and is essential for crafting
messages that genuinely resonate. Self-Interest
Mapping Once segments are identified, each segment's primary
self-interest must be articulated. People pay attention to communications
that connect to their own values, needs, and goals. Strategy must build this
bridge explicitly. |
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Transport for London (TfL) — Cycling Safety Campaign
(2018–2022) Psychographic Segmentation Driving Behaviour Change Transport for London's multi-year cycling safety
campaign provides a sophisticated illustration of psychographic segmentation
applied to PR strategy. Formative research identified that two of the key
at-risk groups — young male commuter cyclists and occasional recreational
cyclists — had very different psychological profiles in relation to cycling
risk. Young male commuters scored high on risk tolerance and low on
constraint recognition (they didn't believe accidents would happen to them),
while recreational cyclists were more risk-averse but had lower levels of
cycling infrastructure knowledge. These psychographic differences produced
entirely different strategy architectures for each segment. For young male
commuters, TfL deployed influencer-led social media content using prominent
urban cyclists and professional athletes, connecting safety equipment with
confidence and control rather than fear — speaking directly to their
self-interest in performance, not survival. For recreational cyclists, TfL
used route mapping, infrastructure guidance, and community events — speaking
to their self-interest in navigating safely through an unfamiliar urban
environment. The campaigns were evaluated separately, with each segment
assessed against its own objective baselines. Reported cycle-related serious
injuries fell by 18% over the campaign period. Reference: Transport for London. (2022). Cycling and Walking
Investment Strategy Progress Report. TfL Corporate Communications. |
Tactics:
Creative Execution Within Strategic Bounds
Tactics are the specific communication
tools and tasks that execute the strategy. They are the most visible and
creative element of the PR planning process — and the element most prone to
being developed in isolation from the strategic structure above it. The
cardinal rule of tactic development is non-negotiable: every tactic must be
traceable to a strategy, and every strategy must be traceable to an objective.
Tactics may include digital and social
content, media releases and press events, community engagement activities,
earned media campaigns, influencer partnerships, events, educational materials,
environmental advertising, and direct stakeholder outreach. The richness of the
tactical toolkit is a genuine strength of modern PR — but only when that
toolkit is deployed strategically.
The challenge is to develop tactics that
cut through the communicative noise competing for the audience's attention,
while maintaining unwavering connection to their strategic purpose. Tactics
that are creative but strategically irrelevant consume budget and generate
activity without generating outcomes.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Dove — "#ShowUs" Campaign (2019) Tactics Born Directly from Strategy Dove's 2019 "#ShowUs" campaign — a
partnership with Getty Images and Girlgaze to create the world's largest
stock photo library of diverse, unretouched images of women — is a model of
tactics developed in direct service of a strategic objective. The formative
research (conducted in collaboration with research firm Ipsos) had
established that 70% of women still did not see themselves represented in
media imagery, and that this gap was a primary driver of declining brand
affinity among younger female consumers. The objective — to increase positive
brand sentiment among women aged 18–34 by 15% within twelve months — drove a
strategy of demonstrating, not claiming, Dove's commitment to real beauty.
The tactic — creating and freely licensing 5,000 authentic images of women in
39 countries — was not chosen for its creativity but because it was the most
direct translation of the strategy into action. The campaign generated
coverage in over 1,300 outlets globally, 660 million social media
impressions, and measurably positive shifts in brand sentiment — all tracked
against the pre-established benchmark. Reference: Dove / Unilever. (2019). #ShowUs Campaign
Measurement Report. Unilever Corporate Communications. |
|
SECTION 04 Step 3 — Communication and
Implementation Actions Speak Louder — and Must Be Planned to Prove It |
The third step of the RACE framework —
Communication and Implementation — is where the plan meets the world. It is the
step most organisations think of first (drafting the press release, designing
the campaign) but which, in a properly executed strategic plan, arrives only
after research has defined the problem and planning has established clear,
measurable objectives.
Two principles govern this stage. First,
the communication must be executed — not just designed. Second, and perhaps
more importantly, communication alone is rarely sufficient. The most effective
PR programmes combine communication and action: what the organisation does must
align with and reinforce what it says. The old adage that actions speak louder
than words is as true in public relations as in any other domain of
organisational life.
Communication
Must Precede Action Readiness
An important nuance in this step is that
some organisations must act before they can communicate. When stakeholder
concerns are driven by an operational reality — a product safety issue, a
service failure, an environmental incident — no amount of communication can
substitute for the corrective action that the public is waiting to see. The
most credible PR message is one that follows, rather than precedes, a genuine
change in organisational behaviour.
If employees are not attending training
seminars, the problem may not be the communication promoting those seminars. It
may be the seminars themselves — their relevance, format, or timing.
Redesigning the communication without first redesigning the product is a
strategy that will fail and waste resources in the process.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Google — "Year in Search" Campaign (2018–present) Communication That Earns Credibility Through Authentic
Alignment Google's annual "Year in Search" campaign
— a short film compiling the year's most searched moments — is among the most
consistently effective PR-driven content initiatives in the technology
sector. Its success is partly tactical (beautifully produced, emotionally
resonant films), but the deeper reason is strategic: the campaign is not a
claim about Google's values; it is a demonstration of them. Google does not
tell audiences that it connects the world's curiosity and concern — it shows
it through the actual data of what people searched for in the moments that
mattered most. The communication works because the underlying product
genuinely does what the campaign suggests. The tactic is aligned with an
organisational reality, not deployed in spite of one. The 2022 edition earned
over 100 million views within its first week of release, with zero paid media
distribution. Reference: Google. (2022). Year in Search Campaign Results.
Google Communications. |
Planning Tools:
The Gantt Chart and Budget
Two practical management tools are
developed during the communication implementation stage: the planning calendar
and the budget. These are not administrative formalities — they are the
mechanisms through which a PR plan's strategic intentions are translated into
executable workflow and resource allocation.
The Gantt chart — a horizontal flow chart
illustrating when each task should begin and end relative to all other tasks —
provides the campaign timeline. It makes dependencies visible (this media brief
cannot be sent before this stakeholder consultation is complete), enables
resource allocation across overlapping workstreams, and creates accountability
through explicit task ownership and deadlines.
The budget requires that every tactic be
costed against its potential for meeting the campaign's stated objectives. This
is a valuable discipline in its own right: some tactics that seem compelling
during brainstorming reveal themselves, under cost-benefit scrutiny, to consume
disproportionate resources relative to their likely contribution to the
objective. The budget forces prioritisation — and in doing so, strengthens the
strategic coherence of the overall campaign.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | World Health Organization (WHO) — Infodemic Management
Campaign (2020–2021) Communication Infrastructure Determining Campaign
Effectiveness When the WHO launched its campaign to counter
COVID-19 misinformation — the so-called "infodemic" that it
identified as a parallel public health emergency — the communication
implementation challenge was extraordinary in scale and complexity. The WHO's
Gantt framework for the campaign had to coordinate: real-time monitoring of
misinformation by topic and geography; content production in multiple
languages; channel deployment across owned, earned, and partnered platforms;
collaboration with social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, TikTok,
WhatsApp) to flag and correct misinformation; and simultaneous evaluation of
message reach and correction rates. The budget allocated between channels was
determined by formative research on information consumption patterns by
demographic segment in different countries — resources were not distributed
equally but strategically, directed to the channels where misinformation was
spreading most rapidly and where corrective messaging would reach the most
relevant publics. The campaign's effectiveness was tracked in real time
through a purpose-built social listening and sentiment analysis
infrastructure, enabling continuous tactical adjustment. Reference: WHO. (2021). Infodemic Management: A Key Component
of the COVID-19 Global Response. World Health Organization. |
|
SECTION 05 Step 4 — Evaluation Measuring What Matters and Learning from the Evidence |
The final step of the RACE framework —
Evaluation — closes the strategic loop that research opened. It answers the
question that every PR investment ultimately asks: did this work? Without
evaluation, there is no accountability, no demonstrable value, and no basis for
improving the next campaign. With it, PR becomes a learning discipline — one
that becomes measurably more effective with each cycle.
Paine identifies four concerns that must be
addressed in evaluating any PR campaign's effectiveness:⁵
⁵ Paine, K. D.
(2007). Measuring public relationships: The data-driven communicator's guide to
success. Berlin, NH: KDPaine & Partners.
5.
Define your benchmark — what level of awareness,
attitude, or behaviour existed before the campaign began?
6.
Select an appropriate measurement tool — using,
wherever possible, the same methods that established the benchmark.
7.
Analyse data, draw actionable conclusions, and make
recommendations for future campaigns.
8.
Make changes and measure again — evaluation is not a
conclusion but a new beginning.
Output,
Outtake, and Outcome Measurement
Evaluation in PR is often conflated with
the counting of media outputs — the number of press clips generated, the social
media impressions achieved, the broadcast minutes earned. This is output
measurement, and while it has its place as an indicator of strategy execution,
it is emphatically not sufficient as a measure of PR effectiveness. It tells
the organisation how widely its message was distributed, not what that
distribution achieved.
The most common — and least informative —
output measurement tool is clip counting. Knowing that a campaign generated 847
media placements says nothing about whether those placements were read, whether
they carried the intended key messages, whether they reached the intended
public, or whether they changed anything. The number may stroke senior
management's egos, but it does not demonstrate PR's contribution to
organisational goals.
More sophisticated output analysis
examines: the percentage of articles containing key programme messages; the
prominence of the message (page one versus page sixteen, lead story versus
brief mention); the tone of coverage (positive, neutral, or negative); and the
organisation's share of voice relative to competitors. These metrics are
genuinely useful for evaluating strategy execution — but they remain output
measures.
What matters most — and what requires
primary research to measure — are outtake and outcome objectives: whether the
audience received and understood the message, and whether the campaign produced
actual changes in awareness, attitude, or behaviour.
|
Why
PR Outperforms Advertising on Key Metrics |
|
Research
by Stacks and Michaelson demonstrates that although public relations and
advertising generate comparable levels of product awareness and brand recall,
PR content produces significantly higher levels of product knowledge and
positive product evaluation than equivalent advertising spend. The
credibility differential — earned media versus paid media — is the
explanation. This finding makes the case for investing in outcome
measurement, not just output counting: the genuine value of PR to the organisation
exceeds what clip counts reveal. |
Continuous
Evaluation and Course Correction
One of the most important principles of PR
evaluation is that it should not wait until the end of a campaign. Continuous
monitoring of message reach (opportunities-to-see, or OTS) and real-time
sentiment analysis allow the PR professional to identify when a strategy is not
working — and to make course corrections in the middle of the programme, not
after it has been completed.
The digital media environment has made
continuous evaluation not merely possible but practically obligatory. Social
listening tools, real-time media monitoring platforms, and rolling survey
methodologies allow organisations to track the trajectory of a campaign's
impact against its benchmarks on a week-by-week or even day-by-day basis. The
organisations that use this capability to make evidence-based mid-campaign
adjustments consistently outperform those that deploy a fixed plan and evaluate
only at the end.
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Netflix — Content Marketing PR Evaluation Framework
(2019–present) Real-Time Evaluation Driving Continuous Campaign
Optimisation Netflix's communications function operates one of
the most sophisticated real-time PR evaluation architectures in the
entertainment industry. For each major content launch, the PR team
establishes pre-launch benchmarks on awareness, viewing intention, and
sentiment across key demographic segments in each market. During the launch
window, social listening dashboards track earned media coverage, social
conversation volume and sentiment, critic response, and audience reaction in
near real-time. When early evaluation data during the launch of a major
series in 2022 indicated that PR messaging was resonating with adult drama
viewers but failing to reach a younger demographic that was a stated
strategic target, the team made a mid-launch tactical adjustment — shifting
media placement priorities toward platforms and publications with younger
audiences and deploying creator-led social content that spoke more directly
to that segment's values. The outcome-level evaluation — conducted two weeks
post-launch through a rapid-turnaround survey — confirmed that the adjustment
had improved awareness among the target demographic by 11 percentage points
relative to the pre-adjustment trajectory. Reference: Netflix Communications Team. (2022). Content PR
Evaluation Framework. Netflix Investor Relations Annual Report. |
Comparative
Analysis and Share of Voice
Evaluation data becomes significantly more
meaningful when placed in comparative context. Rather than knowing the volume
of coverage achieved in isolation, comparative analysis asks: how does this
compare with the coverage achieved by our closest competitors? Share of voice —
the proportion of total coverage within an industry or issue space that is
attributable to the organisation — provides a competitive intelligence
dimension that raw output counting cannot.
Comparative analysis of the same metrics at
different time points — before and after the campaign, month-on-month during
the campaign, year-on-year across campaign cycles — similarly produces insights
that cross-sectional evaluation cannot. The trajectory matters as much as the
point-in-time measure.
|
SECTION 06 The RACE Framework in
Practice How the Four Steps Work Together |
The RACE framework is not a checklist of
sequential tasks — it is an integrated strategic cycle in which each step is
defined by and answers back to the others. The quality of Action Planning is
determined by the quality of Research. The effectiveness of Communication
depends on the precision of Action Planning. The value of Evaluation is
determined by the measurability of the Objectives set in Step 2. And the
insights generated by Evaluation feed directly into the Research of the next
campaign cycle.
This integration means that weakness at any
point in the cycle propagates throughout the whole. An organisation that
conducts excellent research but sets vague, unmeasurable objectives cannot
evaluate its campaign with any confidence. An organisation that sets precise
objectives but conducts no formative research does not know whether its
baseline is accurate. An organisation that executes brilliantly but does not
evaluate cannot demonstrate its value or improve its next performance.
|
The
Four Strategic Questions Every PR Professional Must Ask |
|
①
"What do I know about this situation?" — Situational Analysis
(Research). Ensures the strategy addresses the real problem, not its surface
symptoms. ②
"What do I want to accomplish with my messages?" — Goals and
Objectives (Action Planning). Ensures every communication effort has a
measurable, public-specific outcome attached to it. ③
"How will I accomplish this?" — Strategy (Action Planning). Ensures
tactics are connected to objectives and targeted to the self-interests of the
specific public being addressed. ④
"What will I say?" — Tactics (Communication). Ensures creative
execution is in service of strategic intent, not a substitute for it. |
|
|
MODERN EXAMPLE | Unilever — "Wren+Martin" Earned Media Campaign
(2022) RACE Executed with Measurable Precision "Wren+Martin" — a fictional couple created
by creative agency Ogilvy for Hellmann's mayonnaise in a Super Bowl
commercial — is a case study in the RACE framework executed with full
strategic coherence. Research established that food waste was a significant
concern among the brand's primary demographic (parents aged 25–45), and that
Hellmann's brand awareness trailed key competitors in this segment. Action
planning set objectives around awareness uplift and positive sentiment
increase, with a strategy of connecting the Hellmann's brand to the food
waste issue through culturally resonant storytelling. The communication (a
Super Bowl commercial, supported by earned media outreach to food,
sustainability, and entertainment journalists) was executed with a detailed
Gantt framework coordinating pre-release press seeding, launch-day media
relations, and post-launch social amplification. Evaluation compared
pre-campaign benchmarks on brand awareness and positive sentiment with
post-Super Bowl survey data. The campaign generated measurable brand
awareness gains among the target demographic and earned more than 4 billion
media impressions — all tracked against pre-established baselines. Reference: Unilever / Ogilvy. (2022). Hellmann's "Make
Taste, Not Waste" Campaign Measurement Report. |
|
SECTION 07 Conclusion Strategy Is Not What You Say — It Is What You Plan |
The RACE framework is not a bureaucratic
constraint on creative PR practice. It is the structure that makes creative PR
practice worth doing — by ensuring that every creative decision is connected to
a strategic purpose, every communication effort is directed at a specific
public's self-interests, and every campaign generates evidence that can be used
to justify investment, improve future performance, and demonstrate the PR
function's contribution to organisational goals.
The four questions at the heart of the RACE
cycle — What do I know? What do I want to achieve? How will I achieve it? What
will I say? — are not complicated. But their disciplined, sequential
application is the difference between a PR function that operates strategically
and one that operates tactically. And in the modern communications environment
— where stakeholder expectations are high, trust is fragile, and the cost of
misaligned or misdirected communication is measured in reputational and
financial damage — the strategic PR function is not a luxury. It is a survival
requirement.
The organisations examined in this article
— LEGO, Shell, Transport for London, Dove, Google, WHO, Netflix, Unilever —
share a common characteristic: they treat the RACE cycle not as a template to
be completed but as a discipline to be embedded. Research is conducted before
strategy is set. Objectives are measurable before campaigns are designed.
Evaluation is planned before communication begins. And the insights from each
cycle inform the next.
|
|
The best public relations
programmes include both communication and action. Actions speak louder than
words. And research, planning, and evaluation speak louder than tactics
alone. Strategy is not what you say — it is what you plan, how you measure
it, and what you learn. — Strategic PR Planning Principles |
References
Anderson, F., & Hadley, L. (1999).
Guidelines for setting measurable public relations objectives. Institute for
Public Relations. http://www.instituteforpr.org
Cutlip, S.,
Center, A., & Broom, G. (2006). Effective Public Relations (9th ed.). Upper
Saddle, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Dove /
Unilever. (2019). #ShowUs Campaign Measurement Report. Unilever Corporate
Communications.
Friends of
the Earth Netherlands v. Royal Dutch Shell plc. District Court of The Hague, 26
May 2021. Case No. C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379.
Google.
(2022). Year in Search Campaign Results. Google Communications.
https://about.google
LEGO Group.
(2021). Adults Welcome Campaign — Strategic Brief. LEGO Communications
Division.
Lindenmann,
W. K. (2003). Guidelines for measuring the effectiveness of PR programs and
activities. Institute for Public Relations. http://www.instituteforpr.org
Marston, J.
E. (1979). Modern public relations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Netflix
Communications Team. (2022). Content PR evaluation framework. Netflix Investor
Relations Annual Report. https://ir.netflix.net
Paine, K. D.
(2007). Measuring public relationships: The data-driven communicator's guide to
success. Berlin, NH: KDPaine & Partners.
Stacks, D.
W., & Michaelson, D. (2009). Exploring the comparative communications
effectiveness of advertising and public relations: A replication and extension
of prior experiments. Public Relations Journal, 3, 1–22.
Transport for
London. (2022). Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy Progress Report. TfL
Corporate Communications. https://tfl.gov.uk
Unilever /
Ogilvy. (2022). Hellmann's "Make Taste, Not Waste" Campaign
Measurement Report. Unilever Global Communications.
World Health
Organization. (2021). Infodemic management: A key component of the COVID-19
global response. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int